Which kind of state does NOT typically control operational environments effectively?

Failed states are characterized by a complete breakdown of authority, governance, and civil order, leading to a lack of effective control over their operational environments. In these states, the government is unable to provide basic services, maintain security, or uphold law and order, creating a vacuum where non-state actors, such as militias or terrorist organizations, may thrive. This chaos and instability severely hinder any effort by the state to manage or exert influence over its territory, thereby making it impossible for them to effectively control their operational environments.

In contrast, core states generally possess stable governments, strong institutions, and the capability to maintain order and governance within their territories. Transition states are often in a process of political or social change, and while they may face challenges, they typically still have some level of control compared to failed states. Rogue states might act unpredictably or be isolated, but they still maintain a degree of control over their operational environment, even if it involves engaging in hostile or non-conventional activities.